Page 24 - ENGLISH-RUSSIAN MARKETING DICTIONARY
P. 24

66. community                   flBKa  cpl1pMb1-nOcTaBiqHKa  B
              newspaper                  OTBST  Ha  npaBUTeRbCTBeH­
     oC5iqHHHa.II  raseTa                HOe  saRBReHHe  o  npe�no­
                                          naraeMOM  3aKase/
         67,  community  shop­
                         ;
              e ing  cent r                  76. competitive-
     oC5IqHHHbll1  TOpI'OBblll  4eHTP             bidder's  list
                                         cnHCOK  cpl1pM,  c�eRaBlliH.X
         68. comparative
              advertising                3a.ffBKY  Ha  BbIIlORH8HHe
     peKRa.Ma,  HCilORb3YIOiqaR           npaBHT9RbCTB0HHOI'O  3aKa-
     npHeM  cpaBHSHH.ff  TOBapOB         3a
     HRH  ycRyr  pa3nHqHbIX  Ma­             77. competitive
     pOK                                          capacity
                                          KOHKypeHTOcnocoC5HOCTb
         69. company
                         2
              e rice  tma e                  78. competitive
               11
     "4eHOBOH     o6pa3  «pHpMbl,                 checks,  pl
     o6pa3  cpHpMbl  C  TOqKH  3pe­       c�ep:lltHBaIOiqHe  <paKTOpbl
     HHR  ypoBHR  4eH                     KOHKypeH4Hl1
         7 0,  company  sales                 79,  competitive
              potential                           environment
     noTeH4HM  CC5bITa  q>HpMbI           KOHKypeHTHOe  OKpYJK.eHHe
         71. compan  x   vision              80. competitive
     CTpaTerHqecKHH  3a.Mb!Cen                    impact
     oC5RHKa  H  �eRTSRbHOCTH             sapR�  KOHKypeHTocnoco6-
     q>HpMbI                              HOCTH
         72,  competition                    81. competitive-
              anal sis                             -parity  method
                   x
     npOMhlISHHbM  mnHOHaJK               "ypaBHOB9lliMBaIOiql1�  KOHKy­
     CM. corporate  spying                peH4HI0  11   cnoco6  onpe�ene­
                                          HHR  C5IO,n,,9THbIX  acCHI'HOBa­
         73,  competitive
                                          HHR  q>HpMhl  Ha  peKRaMy,
              advantage
     KOHKypeHTHOe  npeHMyiqecT­           OpHeHTHpOBaHHhlli  Ha  peK­
     BO  /cnocoC5HOCTb  q>HpMbl           JW-l  ClOKeT  ql1p-.m1,8µ1 B
                                          �OH  c$3pe  fI!X)l13BO�CTBa
     npOH3BO�HTb  TOBap  C  60-
     Ree  HH3KO�  ceC5eCTOHMOC­              8  2 •  comp et i t i v e
     TbIIJ/                                       pressure
                                          �aBR8Hl18  CO  CTOpOHbI  KOH­
         74,  competl.tive
                                          KypeHTOB
              behaviour
     KOHKypeHTHOe  noae�eHHe,                 83. computer-genera-
     OTHOlliSHHe  KOHKypeH4Hl1                    ted  form  letter
                                          �eROBOe  nHCbMO,  COCTaB­
         75. competitive  bid
     JWHKypeHTHa.ff  3a.ffBKa  /3a-       RSHHOe  11  pacneqaTaHHOe
                                          Ha  KOMTTblOTepe
                                   -23-
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29